|
by Barbara Cornell, M.S., R.N., C.N.A., as told to Valerie Nanninga
Engeltjes, M.A.
One summer when I was in grade school, my sister and I went to summer
camp. When my mother filled out a camp form, she put my sister down
as a "follower" and me as a "leader." That's the first time I'd ever
heard about someone being a leader and someone being a follower. I remember
my mother saying she saw me as a natural leader.
Barb Cornell is Pine Rest's Nurse Executive. A leader at Pine Rest, Cornell
also has held positions of leadership in her church (as elder and committee
chairs), in professional organizations, and community organizations. These
varied experiences give her a perspective on what it's like for a woman
in a leadership position.
Today: Was your mother right? Are you a natural leader?
I didn't plan to be a leader. I went into nursing because I loved nursing,
but I was at the right place at the right time and became a supervisor.
I really didn't know what I was doing as a manager not having had any
management training. In all my educational classes until then, people
didn't talk about women in leadership, so I was very unprepared.
As I went on to earn my master's in management, I learned a lot of theory
and was able to apply it to the practical experiences I had. I had some
mentors, people who coached me on how to be a leader. Some were male and
some were female. It was a good experience to have both.
What did these coaches tell you?
One woman told me if I were in a meeting with all men-and that's the
kind of meetings I routinely attend-that I shouldn't speak first but to
always let a man talk first.
At first, that's what I did. I'd always let three or four men talk before
I'd add a little something. Even some of the books I read for classes
at the time said women had to learn how to enter the man's world in business
to be like them in order to compete.
Today, we're seeing more literature that affirms the woman's contribution
to the workforce. Women and men complement what each offers in leadership
role. Today's theme is: "Here's the world. We all live in it, and we each
have something we can offer." That's a big change.
I see that translating into better mental health for everyone-which is
why we're addressing this topic in a Pine Rest publication. Pine Rest
has Todays on depression, anxiety, stress, and anger, which can
be the negative effects of handling new and challenging roles. We positively
affect how we fill those roles by acquiring self-esteem, learning to be
assertive, or improving our communication skills.
What are some of the differences you see in men and women in leadership?
I preface everything by saying that I'm generalizing. There are
always exceptions. Given that, here are some observations.
Men are more competitive. They're always trying to figure out what the
"pecking order" is. They compete and joke by putting each other down-trying
to find out the hierarchy.
Women usually aren't as hierarchical and aren't as worried about where
they are on the corporate ladder. Their structure is circular with a center
and concentric rings. Everything radiates from the center. They're naturally
more collaborative and into equality. Women negotiate more than men and
work with each other as a group to bring out the best of each member.
I also see women-and we've gotten a bad name for it-as more tuned in
to our emotions. This isn't "being more emotional." We tend to think of
feelings more and go with our gut feelings. Men are often very technical,
data-driven, and analytical. Women are usually sensitive in their interpersonal
relationships with others. This tends to make their leadership a "softer"
type.
Some of these traits for both men and women are the result of our upbringing,
how our society and culture teaches us to interact.
I talked to some other women about how they viewed the gender differences.
They said women generally show caring for their employees a little easier.
Because of the lesser emphasis on competitiveness, women tend to share
information faster and include others in decisions.
What's happening in America is a change that recognizes both contributions.
Organizations are flattening their hierarchies and using collaboration
to make data-driven decisions.
We hear a lot about a "Glass Ceiling." What has your experience been
with the Glass Ceiling?
I hear other women speak about this. If people don't see it, it can be
that they get so used to the world being the way it is, it's hard to see
what's actually there. For example, it can be hard to separate whether
a woman can't break the glass ceiling because she's female or because
she doesn't go golfing with "the guys."
Suppose you're the male CEO of a company. You have a lot of customers,
and your management staff routinely takes these customers golfing. If
some of the customers don't want to golf with a woman because it doesn't
fit with their kind of golf or jokes, what happens to your organization?
Might you lose business? So, you don't take women golfing, they can't
conduct the same level of business because they don't have the contacts,
they don't get promotions....See the cycle?
What have been some of your experiences working with men in leadership?
Sometimes in meetings when I talk, the men don't hear me. It's as if
I speak a different language at times-they don't get it. And we don't
get what they're saying, either. They can say something and underneath
it are factors that I don't understand because I'm not male. At times,
we do have trouble communicating. We can just miss each other.
As we keep working together more and more, we eventually start hearing
what the other is saying. There can still be a gap, and it takes work
on both sides to communicate over that gap.
This communication gap isn't reserved for organizational meetings. Marriages
and male/female friendships all have times when the two people don't understand
each other because each has a different perception. Part of the reason
is gender, part is background.
Can women be as successful as men in leadership roles?
Men and women often measure success differently.
Generally, men are more into power and prestige. In business-and this
is changing-it used to be you had to give up your personal life to succeed.
Work was your everything. You had to "sell your soul to the company store."
Women are bringing a sense of balance to the workplace. Yet the policies
in place in most organizations were set up on the "sell your soul" philosophy.
You're penalized (or at least, not rewarded) if you don't.
We're sending two messages to women. We expect them to be "good mothers"
and spend some time with their children, but then penalize them because
they aren't working full-time. The double messages often produce anxiety
in people because they don't know how to react. The Mommy Track is a reality,
but it doesn't have to stay this way. As more women gain positions of
leadership and affect policies, that will change. Women generally see
work as a part of their life, not the focus. We learn how to balance everything
because we have to--people are pulling us every which way. Most men don't
juggle as many roles and tasks as women do. For women, success is balancing
all the aspects of their lives. Sometimes that's more rewarding than a
big raise.
As I said, policies and procedures were put into place when men worked
and women stayed home. Slowly, the policies are changing. Some changes
come from the national government, such as parental leave. Often the changes
help both sexes.
The policies affect aspects other than just the workplace. Some are so
entrenched, people don't even realize the discrimination they promote.
How will businesses and organizations change?
While some change is inevitable given the workforce demographics, we
shouldn't just wait for it to happen. Male mentors can help women break
the glass ceiling. They can affirm our complementary talents. There are
many male mentors who firmly believe that women deserve and can succeed
at high levels in organizations.
One hindering factor is the "Old Boy's Network." It's there and it's
insidious. Many men don't even realize it's there because the network
is just their friends and acquaintances. They went to school with someone,
so when a position opens, they think of that person. The problem is they
all tend to be males. The first thought that pops into their minds isn't:
"I should hire a woman I could mentor and bring up in the organization."
It's not a conscious effort to keep women out, it just doesn't come to
their mind to bring women in.
That's where a Human Resource Department and the women in the organization
need to say, "What about this woman," or "How about helping us set up
the organization so I could get a male mentor and learn from him?" Women
already in leadership positions can work to hire more women and can take
the responsibility for mentoring them.
What kind of advice would you give a woman you were mentoring?
I'd encourage her to be herself, be innovative, and creative. She doesn't
have to be a clone of the males in the organization. She should keep pushing
to find how her talents complement theirs.
I would tell the person I was mentoring to network well and get a support
system in place because she'll need it. Often women in leadership feel
isolated and uncertain about "how they should act." This can hurt their
self-esteem and lead to depression. When women feel one way, but are told
to act another (for example, "like a man"), they may experience increased
stress and anxiety.
Women can help each other. It's important that women leaders share their
knowledge and experience to coach other women and men. This helps
get more women in leadership and increases male appreciation for what
women bring to leadership.
While the Mommy Track is a reality, I tell people to have a full life.
Realize that if you have a family and you want to work full-time and you
want to rise in your career, it takes a lot of energy. If you want children
and don't want to work full-time at that point, that's OK.
Women also need to learn how to deal with their emotional side. Do you
show emotions? Hide them? In the mental health field, we all know what
happens if you keep those feelings inside. They eat away at you. Women
need to learn appropriate ways to handle the emotions-ways that can be
accepted and perceived by others.
I'd continually say, "Be true to yourself." If you're in a room with
men who are in power positions, be yourself. You don't have to play those
games. Playing the games causes stress. I've heard other women in business
who say you must play those games. I don't feel I'd be true to myself
if I did.
You have to feel good about being true to yourself. Feel self-assured.
Your head and your heart have to go together. Once they do, you'll feel
better about your accomplishments, be able to communicate more effectively,
and experience less depression, stress, and anxiety. You'll be a mentally
healthier, more well-rounded person. If necessary, take classes in assertive
communication or stress management.
Polish your style. Learn about facts because you'll need to know those,
but remember you have a softer side. You can have business savvy and be
a good leader without being just like a man.
What about being leaders in areas other than business?
Many of the same principles apply. Some organizations, however, can be
harder to change. When people comment negatively on my leadership roles
in my church, I always go back to biblical times and look at where our
traditions started. We have to put those traditions in the context of
the culture. We all know how women were not valued in biblical times.
On the positive side, there are some wonderful biblical examples that
defy the culture. They affirm how God-if not the culture-values women.
Today, women are taking on more leadership roles in churches, politics,
and the community. This is a big change from years past. Yet, our policies
need to change. If we don't change the policies, it's easy to continue
with blinders on, doing everything the way we've always done it.
How we change is to have an experience where a lightning bolt comes down
and we're challenged to look at an issue or situation another way. The
thunderbolt sometimes is just asking, "Why not?" We need to start asking
that question for everything from female priests to women CEOs.
| If women continue to move into top business ranks at the current
rate, the numbers of male and female senior managers will not be equal
until the year 2470. In a 1990 survey of male CEOs in financial services,
73 percent of the male executives didn't believe the "glass ceiling"
existed. A 1992 survey of 439 senior women executives found that 93
percent of them believed it did. Of senior managers at Fortune 1,000
and Fortune 500 companies, 91 percent are white males. Women hold
5 percent of the senior level jobs in major corporations. Of those
women, only 5 percent are minorities.
A woman working full-time, year-round, will make on average
only 72 cents for every $1 a man makes. If she's an executive, it
will be 74 cents. A retail sales clerk makes 66 cents, and a woman
of color averages just 63 cents.
When women go into traditionally male occupations, they're paid
less than men are (female truck drivers, 70 cents on the man's dollar;
female lawyers, 74 cents). But when men enter traditionally female
occupations, they're paid more than women are: male registered nurses,
$1.04 on the female dollar; male office clerks, $1.09; male cashiers,
$1.17.
A man with a college degree will make an average of $15,000
a year more than a similarly qualified woman-giving him a bonus
of $600,000 over his 40-year work life. A woman with a B.A. or even
an advanced degree earns an average of just $41 a week more than
a man with a high school diploma. The result: In 1993 alone, American
women lost about $100 billion in wages to gender pay inequities.
Women are three times more likely than men to lose a job because
of sexual harassment, five times more likely to transfer to another
site or department to escape it and nine times more likely to quit
because of it.
Statistics from "Excuse Me, Are Women Equal Yet?" Glamour,
February 1996.
|
| A Lightning Bolt
One day, Bob and Tom were discussing the roles women played in
each of their churches. While one church had women serving in many
capacities, the other had no women on its Leadership Council. Tom
said, "We put females up for election and they never get in. It's
not our fault they never get elected."
"How many people do you elect each time?" asked Bob.
"Five," Tom replied.
Bob responded, "Why don't you nominate six women and four men?
Then you're bound to get a woman on the Council."
"We can't do that!" Tom exclaimed. "It wouldn't be right. We'd
be tipping the balance."
Bob looked at him and said, "Haven't you done that all your life
with men?"
|
|